Volatility, FOFA force financial planners to cut costs

market volatility global financial crisis industry super funds FOFA financial planning money management financial advice government

12 September 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Most financial planning principals have felt the need to reduce costs within their businesses, with many targeting support services or cutting back on factors such as platform costs, according to a survey conducted by Money Management.

The survey, conducted during the last week of August and first week of September, revealed two primary drivers for the cost-cutting - market volatility leading to client nervousness, and uncertainty flowing from the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes.

The survey revealed that 88 per cent of respondents had felt the need to reduce costs in their businesses, with nearly 60 per cent of those who had not already done so indicating cost-cutting was probably inevitable.

{^image|(width)600|(height)168|(mouseoverheight)224|(url)http://media.cirrusmedia.com.au/Money_Media_Library/Print_Images/120913…"margin-left: 40px; ">
"Difficulty convincing new clients [of] the value of advice, especially ongoing services as opposed to transactional strategic advice."

"Reduced commissions because of market instability."

"Uncertainty with the implementation of FOFA and future value of the business makes me wary of additional investment in staff and technology."

"Reduced revenue following GFC [global financial crisis] has put a strain on cashflow."

"Uncertainty, clients wanting more for less, pressure on fees, need to streamline processes."

"Cost of providing a full service option for the majority of my clients and having reliable support staff to assist with this service is creating a higher cost. Many of my clients will need to either pay more for my full service or downgrade their level of service."

"In process of changing to fee-for-service model to meet FOFA compliance for this administration work. When further details from ASIC are available, additional costs will be incurred to comply with the proposed regulations, and setting up new computer systems and staff workflows will incur more costs.

"The figure of $11 p.a. per client quoted by the Industry Super Funds to comply with the FOFA legislation is nowhere near the true cost that will be added to my practice running costs."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS