Twin peaks should co-regulate, sharpen teeth
In the Banking Royal Commission’s final report, Commissioner Kenneth Hayne has advised the corporate regulators and ‘twin peaks’, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) to be statutorily required to co-operate, co-regulate when it comes to superannuation, and to sharpen their teeth when it comes to enforcement.
Commissioner Hayne recommended that ASIC in particular know when an infringement notice simply won’t cut it, which he says would generally be for provisions that require an evaluative judgment and ‘would rarely be an appropriate enforcement tool where the infringing party is a large corporation’.
“…Improving compliance with financial services laws cannot be achieved by focusing only on negotiation and persuasion,” he said.
“Negotiation and persuasion, without enforcement, all too readily leads to the perception that compliance is voluntary. It is not.”
Hayne recommended ASIC also recognise the relevance and importance of general and specific deterrence in deciding whether to accept an enforceable undertaking.
In particular, Hayne drew attention to the fact that the regulator must approach the work ahead with a clear view on what kinds of outcome would be considered.
“And unless it is plain that the public interest requires that there be no litigation, all forms of regulatory enforcement must remain under active consideration,” he said.
When it comes to superannuation, Hayne recommended the regulators learn to share, and that APRA should be responsible for establishing and enforcing Prudential Standards while ASIC look after the relationships between RSE licensees and individual consumers.
Without limiting any powers APRA has under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) (SIS) Act, Hayne recommended ASIC be given the power to enforce all provisions in the SIS Act that are civil penalty provisions, and that there be co-regulation for these provisions.
“…Providing ASIC with the power to protect the interests of members would provide some consistency across the two legislative regimes that apply to RSE licensees,” said Hayne.
He also recommended the regulators should jointly administer the BEAR, with ASIC to oversee Divisions one, two and three of Part IIAA of the Banking Act that concern consumer protection and market conduct matters while APRA should oversee the prudential aspects.
On the subject of the BEAR, Hayne recommended the provisions modelled on the BEAR should be extended to all APRA-regulated financial services institutions, and those new provisions should also be jointly administered by and applied to the regulators.
Hayne finally recommended a new oversight authority be imposed on the regulators independent of the Government to assess the effectiveness of each regulator in discharging its functions and meeting its statutory objects.
AUTHOR
Anastasia Santoreneos
Recommended for you
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.
The Senate economics legislation committee has recommended Schedule 1 of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes legislation be passed as it is a “faithful implementation” of the recommendations.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has handed down his third budget, outlining the government’s macroeconomic forecasts and changes to superannuation.
