TTR strategies still valid despite Budget

"financial-planning"/

8 August 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Transition to retirement (TTR) strategies will remain valid even if the Government's 2016 Budget changes are passed by the Parliament, the SMSF Association Technical Conference has been told.

BT Financial Group head of financial literacy and advocacy, Bryan Ashenden, cautioned against suggesting that the worth of a TTR strategy was only valid if its tax benefits remained in place.

In doing so, he outlined the reasons a TTR would remain a valid option for people as they reached retirement age including:

  • The ability to trade off taxable employment income with pension income that is taxed more favourably to an individual, with the benefit of increasing the amount that is accumulated in the super fund to help a member reach their retirement goals;
  • The ability to allow a member to transition to retirement through a gradual or partial reduction in their employment hours and using the TTR to supplement income needs; and
  • The ability to access some accumulated superannuation savings to accelerate repayment of debts, such as a home loan, which will reduce expenses when the member fully retires.

Ashenden said what needed to be remembered was that from a TTR perspective the only benefits lost were the tax exempt status of the pension earnings and the reduction in the concessional contribution cap. Effectively, the consequences were:

  • Fifteen per cent of the taxable earnings on assets that support the TTR income stream; plus
  • The difference between the member's marginal tax payable on the (up to) $10,000 reduction in the concessional cap that would otherwise have been contributed to super and the 15 per cent tax that would have been payable in the fund on that amount; less
  • The amount of tax that the member would have paid on the TTR income drawn during the year that would be above the amount expected to be withdrawn post 1 July 2017.

"Applying the above formula will result in the loss of some amount of a benefit to the member, but it is unlikely that it will reduce the tangible benefit of a TTR strategy to nil.

"In fact, the only scenario where there may be cause to consider ceasing to utilise a TTR is where a member is drawing income that is surplus to their needs and would otherwise be recontributing that amount back to their super fund."

Ashenden said it was imperative that SMSF specialists were cognisant to the proposed change to the TTR strategy, and they needed to ensure their trustee clients were across the issue.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

5 days 16 hours ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 week 3 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

2 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND