TTR strategies still valid despite Budget

"financial planning"

8 August 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Transition to retirement (TTR) strategies will remain valid even if the Government's 2016 Budget changes are passed by the Parliament, the SMSF Association Technical Conference has been told.

BT Financial Group head of financial literacy and advocacy, Bryan Ashenden, cautioned against suggesting that the worth of a TTR strategy was only valid if its tax benefits remained in place.

In doing so, he outlined the reasons a TTR would remain a valid option for people as they reached retirement age including:

  • The ability to trade off taxable employment income with pension income that is taxed more favourably to an individual, with the benefit of increasing the amount that is accumulated in the super fund to help a member reach their retirement goals;
  • The ability to allow a member to transition to retirement through a gradual or partial reduction in their employment hours and using the TTR to supplement income needs; and
  • The ability to access some accumulated superannuation savings to accelerate repayment of debts, such as a home loan, which will reduce expenses when the member fully retires.

Ashenden said what needed to be remembered was that from a TTR perspective the only benefits lost were the tax exempt status of the pension earnings and the reduction in the concessional contribution cap. Effectively, the consequences were:

  • Fifteen per cent of the taxable earnings on assets that support the TTR income stream; plus
  • The difference between the member's marginal tax payable on the (up to) $10,000 reduction in the concessional cap that would otherwise have been contributed to super and the 15 per cent tax that would have been payable in the fund on that amount; less
  • The amount of tax that the member would have paid on the TTR income drawn during the year that would be above the amount expected to be withdrawn post 1 July 2017.

"Applying the above formula will result in the loss of some amount of a benefit to the member, but it is unlikely that it will reduce the tangible benefit of a TTR strategy to nil.

"In fact, the only scenario where there may be cause to consider ceasing to utilise a TTR is where a member is drawing income that is surplus to their needs and would otherwise be recontributing that amount back to their super fund."

Ashenden said it was imperative that SMSF specialists were cognisant to the proposed change to the TTR strategy, and they needed to ensure their trustee clients were across the issue.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS