Tax reform needed over GST and public sector service funding

ABA/funding/taxation/productivity-commission/

4 September 2017
| By Hope William-Smith |
image
image
expand image

The banking industry is largely in support of equal access to publicly funded services, but the way GST is distributed still needs addressing to preserve efficiency and fairness in Australia’s tax system, according to the Australian Bankers’ Association (ABA).

Former Queensland premier and ABA chief executive Anna Bligh called out the goods and services tax (GST) distribution history over the past two decades, saying “unintended and undesirable consequences” were part of the mechanism for its distribution.

In the ABA’s submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into horizontal fiscal equalisation, Bligh said there was legitimacy to the view that GST had not worked in line with its original envisaged outcome.

“The distribution should be able to better respond to fluctuations in revenue sources, to avoid unplanned budget deficits and financial market disruption,” she said.

“Australia needs well-considered tax reform that focuses on driving economic activity, investment and jobs.”

Bligh pointed at discrepancies within the provision of GST and called for more flexible strategy to address economic variables.

“States and territories derive limited benefit from some sources of revenue raising,” she said.

“It is clearly untenable for states such as Western Australia to receive a GST share of less than 35 cents in the dollar, nor was this possibility foreseen or intended by the original GST agreement.

“The distribution should be able to better respond to fluctuations in revenue sources, to avoid unplanned budget deficits and financial market disruption.”

The proposed major bank levy by South Australia was also touted as a key issue of concern by the ABA, with Bligh stating its introduction was in direct contradiction to the GST agreement to eliminate financial taxes.

“No state should gain a financial benefit from breaking the agreement,” she said.

“Banks pay GST on their inputs but do not collect GST on the financial services and products the provide [and] this ‘input-taxing’ of financial services means that GST becomes a direct cost to financial institutions.”

The draft report of the PC inquiry is expected in October.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

1 week 3 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

2 weeks 2 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND