Superannuation tax concession costs 'grossly overestimated'

association-of-superannuation-funds/ASFA/superannuation-funds/superannuation-guarantee/future-of-financial-advice/chief-executive/

15 February 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The cost of further superannuation tax concessions is inaccurate and based on outdated data, according to new research released by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

The estimates for what superannuation tax concessions would cost are grossly overestimated, and the actual cost of super tax concessions could be as little as half that reported in the 2011 Tax Expenditures Statement, according to ASFA's 'The equity of Government assistance for retirement income in Australia' report.

Overall superannuation tax concessions are predominantly equitable, and many of the figures and statistics currently being used in debate around the equity of the super system are incorrect or outdated, the report found.

The greatest beneficiaries of tax concessions on superannuation are currently middle income earners - contrary to the perception that high income earners are favoured.

Tax concessions would become even more equitable, given an increase in the superannuation guarantee and the low income earners contributions tax rebate, combined with the contributions caps, ASFA stated.

Figures such as the statistic that Australia's top 5 per cent of income earners receive 37 per cent of total superannuation contributions are outdated and relate to a time when the concessional caps were higher; it is currently less than 20 per cent, said ASAF chief executive Pauline Vamos.

ASFA said there was still room for improvement in the superannuation system, with gaps in coverage relating to the inequitable treatment of the self-employed.

Low contributions caps also discriminate against women and others with variable work patterns, Vamos said. 

Other reforms including Stronger Super and the Future of Financial Advice will deliver improvements to the system, but further fundamental changes could undermine confidence in the system, she said.

"ASFA believes the focus for policy makers should be on improving the coverage and effectiveness of the current system rather than throwing it out and starting again," she said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 days 10 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

1 week 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND