Super funds want death and TPD tax equivalence
Superannuation funds want death and total and permanent disablement (TPD) insurance within superannuation to carry the same benefits as insurance sold outside of superannuation.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has used a submission to the Parliament Committee Inquiry into the Life Insurance industry to urge equal treatment, claiming the current regulatory settings are "distortive".
It said there were opportunities to reform what represented tax impediment and argued that the Government needed to "consider the distortive effect of the regulatory settings with respect to the taxation of insured benefits inside and outside superannuation".
"While it is more cost efficient to provide death and TPD lump sum insurance through superannuation, the differing tax treatment of benefits paid out can lead to significant differences in the amount of the net benefit received by the member/beneficiaries," the submission said.
It pointed out that part of lump sum TPD benefits (before age 60) and all of death benefits (to non-dependants) paid from superannuation funds were subject to tax at a rate up to 32 per cent, whereas death and TPD insurance payouts made outside superannuation are generally tax free in the hands of the recipient.
"The benefits of insurance in superannuation could be improved by providing tax treatment more equivalent to non-superannuation arrangements," the submission said.
However the submission argued strongly for the benefits of providing insurance within superannuation, pointing out that for most Australians the insurance they have in their superannuation is the only life insurance they hold.
"The provision of group insurance in superannuation is therefore a crucial part of the system supporting Australians who suffer a health-related misfortune," it said.
Recommended for you
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.
