Stand-alone act needed for whistleblowers

policy whistleblowing regulation

4 May 2017
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

A stand-alone act for corporate whistleblowers is needed as regulator-specific provisions across many pieces of legislation does not provide the best protection for those exposing misconduct, the Governance Institute of Australia believes.

The institute said a stand-alone act that covered disclosure of any sort of misconduct and that provided protection regardless of which regulator the whistle blower disclosed to is what was needed.

Citing a whistleblowing report by Griffith University, the institute said the Corporations Act currently required employees who received information about corporate misconduct from a whistleblower to pass it on to regulators.

The institute’s chief executive, Steven Burrell, said: “They cannot discuss how to stop the misconduct with their colleagues or take internal action to remedy or prevent it unless the whistleblower provides consent, which means the misconduct can continue and does little to foster sound corporate governance”.

“If we want whistleblowers to come forward we’ve got to streamline the process.”

He said the current act required whistleblowers to have a detailed understanding of whether the misconduct they were reporting was covered by corporate law or could relate to competition, tax, workplace health and safety, bribery or corruption or industrial relations, all of which were covered by different legislation and regulators.

“We do not believe that a whistleblower should be required to have a nuanced knowledge of legislation to know which regulator or law enforcement agency they approach to qualify for protection. It is a strong disincentive to making disclosures if employees or concerned members of the public feel that they require legal advice before making any such disclosure,” he said.

Burrell suggested Australia follow the lead of the US and the UK where there were general provisions for allegations of misconduct made in good faith, and which did not attract retribution.

“…a robust and independent whistleblowing process that makes employees feel comfortable about fearlessly reporting wrongdoing is a critical asset in building the kind of positive, ethical culture that supports strong corporate outcomes,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 5 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 3 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 22 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

5 days 2 hours ago