Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

SMSF Association warns Govt on AFCA costs

financial-planning/regulation/

6 October 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Government has again been warned that it risks significantly escalating the cost of providing financial advice through the creation of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA).

This time, the SMSF Association has told the Senate Economics References Committee that while the organisation supports the creation of a one stop shop external dispute resolution body “we do hold some concerns that costs for advisors who currently subscribe to the Financial Ombudsman Scheme (FOS) or the Credit and Insurance Ombudsman (CIO) may rise depending on the fees levied by the AFCA”.

The submission urged the Government to pay careful attention to the increased costs associated with the creation of the AFCA and suggested that fees should not be increased beyond those already paid to FOS and the CIO.

“We believe that the legislation should include reference to ongoing costs for members of the new EDR scheme to ensure that fees are maintained at a reasonable level (for example, not increased above current levels paid to FOS or CIO),” the SMSF Association submission said.

It said this was especially relevant as financial advisers and licensees would face increased costs in the immediate future through ASIC cost-recovery levies and the new education and ethical framework for financial advisers.

“We are wary of increased financial costs to advisers depending on the fee structure of the AFCA,” the submission said. “We believe the minister should ensure that during the selection process of the company that will form the AFCA, that industry fees are a key consideration and should be constrained to existing levels (e.g. FOS or CIO fees).”

“Ensuring that fees for the new EDR body are constrained is especially important given the increased costs facing financial advisers,” it said, noting that there would also be the regulatory compliance costs of:

  • Training for advisers to understand the new EDR scheme;
  • Changing disclosure requirements and documentation for clients; and
  • Sharing of internal dispute resolution information with ASIC for licensees.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

6 days 3 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND