Scrutinise group life underwriting says AFA
The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has canvassed having group life placed on the same footing as advised life, with underwriting at the time of application.
The AFA has canvassed the proposal in a submission to the Joint Parliamentary Committee review of the Life Insurance Industry at the same time as arguing for better disclosure around the differences between direct insurance, group insurance and retail advised insurance.
In a list of recommendations to the Parliamentary Committee, the AFA has pointed to a key differentiator between retail advised insurance and group insurance and has called for insurers to be required to underwrite all insurance products at the time of application "banning the practice often seen in direct and group insurance of underwriting at the time of claim".
The submission has also recommended that insurers be required to not increase premiums during the first two years of policy commencement (thus matching the clawback period applying to advisers), except for consumer price index (CPI) increases in the sum insured.
It has also recommended that insurers be made to comply with the duty of utmost good faith with disclosure comparisons to enable informed decisions before consumers choose to replace existing policies that they hold into direct channels.
The AFA submission also recommended that, to facilitate better transparency and decision making, superannuation funds should be required to "disclose their arrangements with life insurers in relation to their group life insurance agreements".
It also recommended a review of remuneration rules to ensure that people insured through group insurance were able to access quality financial advice.
Recommended for you
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.
