The regulatory pendulum swings too far

compliance financial planning PDS government and regulation global financial crisis financial services reform FOFA

11 September 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The global financial crisis (GFC) has combined with the sovereign debt crises to deliver Australia a more interventionist and rules-based regulatory regime, according to major consultancy firm, Deloitte.

The firm has used its submission to the Financial Systems Inquiry (FSI) to argue that the result of this has been a costly regulatory regime not conducive to innovation and has included the Future of Financial Advice changes as being a factor in that outcome.

"…in the wake of the GFC and sovereign debt crises, Australia has seen more interventionist and rules-based regulation and regulators," the Deloitte submission said. "The results of this are clear. Australia has ended up with prescriptive regulation, encouraging a compliance culture — both amongst the regulated and the regulators."

"The regulation adds to costs and is not conducive to innovation; for example, product disclosure statements (PDS) have not worked, but have added significantly to the compliance burden. A wide-range of regulatory changes have been introduced in recent years or are now being introduced — pre-GFC: the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA) and Basel II; and post-GFC: prudential regulations for insurance, anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CTF), Basel III, regulation of credit rating agencies, OTC derivative reforms and Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms," it said.

"In isolation, the call on resources to implement the individual changes may not be large, but the cumulative impact of these changes on costs is likely to have been significant.'

The submission said that it was in these circumstances it was important to assess whether the benefits of the new regulations had justified the costs.

"There is no clear framework for undertaking this task. However, our assessment is that the pendulum has swung too far. By losing sight of the principles, new regulations may increase costs, without creating sufficient benefits to justify them," the Deloitte submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 2 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 day 11 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS