RC will force regulation, but less is more

Royal Commission wealth management RC David Murray Madison Financial Group Annick Donat

image
image
expand image

The consensus across industry experts is that a post-Royal Commission world will involve complete and full disclosure, but more paperwork and onus on the institutions won’t work, a panel has told Money Management and Super Review’s Future of Wealth Management conference.

The experts said while the Royal Commission was much more consumer-orientated than it was originally thought to be, whether consumers were aware of the compliance burdens placed on institutions was “another story”.

“It’s more paperwork into the system … and none of it protects the clients,” added Steve Davis, chief commercial officer, Infocus.

“Somehow, regulators need to understand that less is more, but unfortunately that won’t come out of the Royal Commission.”

When asked if industry funds got off lightly, AustralianSuper group executive, Paul Schroder, said people had forgotten the human impact on those involved.

“The only message I’d like to convey is don’t forget the human impact on the people in this broader financial services industry of this Royal Commission,” he said. “If you’re involved directly its exhausting, and if you work in an institution that’s involved, it challenges and upsets your confidence.”

But other panellists thought they had, with Grahame Evans, managing director, GPS Wealth, telling the conference that industry funds didn’t receive the intensity of interrogation as the other institutions.

David Murray, CEO of Sterling Private Wealth, said industry funds were fortunate because of where the Royal Commission directed its attention in its early stages.

“I think the order has been quite deliberate,” he said.

The experts were hesitant to place onus on the regulators though, with Evans telling the conference that regulators have had to “battle hard” and negotiate against “some really high power”.

Annick Donat, CEO of Madison Financial Group, said it was unfair to judge the regulators against the Royal Commission.

But, all the experts agreed the Royal Commission was timely and necessary, with Schroder indicating that the general public “needed it”.

“It reminds the executives and the boards and owners that it’s not their money,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 1 week ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 2 weeks ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

2 weeks 2 days ago