RC missed mark on vertical integration says Fels
Former Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) chairman, Professor Alan Fels has added his voice to those who believe the Royal Commission should have gone longer and looked more deeply at policy.
Speaking on a panel at the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF), Fels described it as a “lawyer’s Royal Commission” which delivered a lawyer’s outcome.
Further, he said that in the end the banks had got off somewhat lightly, albeit that some individuals would pay a price.
“The big banks got off a bit lightly,” he said. “Some individuals will pay a price but there was less impact on the organisations than I thought would have occurred.”
“Hayne took a relatively conservative approach and relied very heavily on regulation and change culture to fix the situation and put things right,” Fels said.
He said the Royal Commissioner had said that responsibility lay at the top level of financial institutions but had then failed to go deeply into them.
“There were no deep structural changes proposed or addressed,” Fels said. “For example, the question of vertical integration”
‘Other structural questions also needed to be much more deeply addressed,” he said. “There was not a great deal on remuneration and conflicted remuneration – these are difficult issues which need to be pursued more deeply.”
Recommended for you
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.
