Practices ready to act on grandfathering amendments

commissions/financial-planning/financial-planning-practices/financial-advice/FOFA/future-of-financial-advice/

13 January 2014
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

A significant number of financial planning practices are ready to take advantage of the grandfathering amendments to the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms after preparing for the changes in advance. 

Radar Result principal John Birt said based on discussions taking place with advisory contacts that he was aware of more than 40 practices ready to respond to the grandfathering amendments to FOFA despite them being announced only days before Christmas last year.

Birt said that he had seen a number of practices beginning to move ahead with sales based on the 20 December announcement and that practices looking to sell their business through Radar Results had been receiving ongoing advice since July last year. 

"All along, we have said it's nonsense, and the clients and the attached revenue could always be moved, but dark imaginings took hold and everyone froze. Unfortunately, a number of licensee groups used this negativity to scare their advisers into staying with their existing licensee," Birt said. 

"The problem we had between July and December last year was the product providers being too cautious or scared to pay the commissions to a new licensee. I believe the legal advice that they had received was incorrect - but the safest option was to do nothing." 

The grandfathering amendments were a relief, according to Birt, in that the grandfathering matter had now been clarified. However Peloton Partners principal David Murray said planners should not see the amendments as being 'FOFA proof' but 'FOFA lucky'. 

"The planning sector had some impression that changes were coming and were waiting for it but the model about how clients seek and get advice still needs to change," Murray said. 

According to Murray planners have been given an opportunity to work on the value proposition of their business but should not expect that the grandfathering amendments would provide them with a premium price for their businesses at time of sale. 

"What has changed is that we have a line in the sand date which provides relief and that it opens the market for those selling a business - but planners will still need to tackle recurring revenues and conflicted remuneration."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 19 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo