Opt-in FOFA consequences for industry funds
The Federal Government does not have a "plan B" in the event that the Palmer United Party sides with the Opposition and the Greens to disallow the regulations changing Future of Financial Advice (FOFA), but industry funds may then find themselves equally exposed to factors such as opt-in, and fee disclosure.
The Minister for Finance and Acting Assistant Treasurer, Senator Mathias Cormann, has held out the likelihood of ensuring that industry funds will find themselves fully exposed to what many financial planners regard as the most costly and time-consuming elements of the FOFA legislation — opt-in and retrospective fee disclosure.
What is more, he claims the industry funds were specifically excluded from exposure to opt-in and fee disclosure via a special deal formulated by former Financial Services Minister and now Federal Opposition leader, Bill Shorten.
Acknowledging that the Palmer United Party leader, Clive Palmer has been subjected to a barrage of negative analysis on the FOFA changes, Cormann has denied there is anything in the Government's package which undermines consumer protections.
"With our improvements to financial advice laws which came into effect on 1 July, we have started to deliver on firm policy commitments we made in the lead up to the last election," he said. "In doing so, we kept all the important consumer protections in place, in particular the statutory requirement for advisers to act in the best interest of their clients and the ban on conflicted remuneration for financial advisers."
"In our regulations we went even further by banning all commissions for general advice provided by bank employees and others in the context of relevant financial product sales."
"I look forward to the opportunity to discuss these issues with Mr Palmer, PUP Senators and all other crossbench senators with an interest in this issue over the next week," Cormann said.
"There is no plan B. We have presented the improvements to our financial advice laws we took to the last election with the objective to have a robust but also an efficient and competitively neutral regulatory system in place, where people saving for their retirement, managing their retirement or managing any other financial risks through life can access high quality advice they can trust and which is also affordable," the minister said.
"What I will do though, if the Senate is indeed of the view for example that Opt-In and retrospective fee disclosure requirements should stay in place for small business financial advisers, is consider whether in the interest of competitive neutrality, those requirements should apply equally across the financial services sector, including to all advice provided through industry funds, which Bill Shorten exempted from those requirements in a special deal for them when he was the Minister," Cormann said.
Recommended for you
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.
The Senate economics legislation committee has recommended Schedule 1 of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes legislation be passed as it is a “faithful implementation” of the recommendations.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has handed down his third budget, outlining the government’s macroeconomic forecasts and changes to superannuation.
