NAB chairman suggests unilateral client remediation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44720/447205900e57f63a814f387f09d7428dbc6c3b20" alt="remediation image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44720/447205900e57f63a814f387f09d7428dbc6c3b20" alt="remediation image"
National Australia Bank (NAB) chairman, Ken Henry has suggested that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) need not be consulted and that organisations such as the banks should just get on with customer remediation where wrongdoing has occurred.
Giving testimony before the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, Henry acknowledged that NAB’s reputation had been “tarnished considerably” by adviser service fee issues and the manner in which they had been handled by management.
“I wish we could have said to management ‘enough is enough, forget about ASIC just do’,” Henry said.
When asked what he meant by “just do it”, the NAB chairman said he meant remediating customers.
In doing so, Henry suggested that the Royal Commission might pursue recommendations which gave banks scope to take such an approach, noting that there currently existed a danger that banks might move to remediate customers only to be told by ASIC years later that the remediation was not enough.
Recommended for you
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.