MySuper must be considered with FOFA: CSSA

commissions/insurance/FOFA/government-and-regulation/financial-advice/parliamentary-joint-committee/mysuper/

17 January 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

There is too much crossover between MySuper legislation and Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) legislation for the two to be considered separately, according to the Corporate Super Specialist Alliance (CSSA).

One area where the two are linked is the insurance service fee. As part of its submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on the MySuper bill, the CSSA said the removal of commissions for group insurances inside superannuation effectively prohibits payments to advisers for the services they provide to employers and their employees.

"Removal of commissions will create an unlevel playing field and could result in advice to a consumer that sees them using a less appropriate insurance solution," the CSSA stated. It could also create a distortion in the market, with commission being paid on group insurance outside of superannuation but not inside, potentially leading to inappropriate solutions being offered to clients. 

The CSSA proposed to allow an insurance service fee on a "dial-up" basis where insurance services are provided to a MySuper employer group. 

An explicit Insurance Service Fee, which defaults to zero, could be charged to all members at an agreed percentage with the consent of the client at the workplace level, the CSSA proposed.

The CSSA also said that member accounts should only be transitioned to MySuper accounts with the consent of the member. The transition should not occur automatically because this could result in changes to investments or insurance coverage.

The CSSA said the intra-fund advice fee needed to be explicit and transparent. It should be negotiated at the workplace level in response to the amount of services required by the members of the MySuper fund, while personal advice should continue to be paid for by the individual receiving the advice.

The legislation currently states MySuper funds can't be tailored for individual employers making contributions for less than 500 staff, but the CSSA argued that if there must be a limit then 50 is a fairer number.

The CSSA also called for the introduction of an explicit fee within a MySuper fund to allow for the ongoing provision of education and services to fund members. Currently, the removal of commissions and lack of an option for a plan-based fee means corporate superannuation specialists will have to withdraw from the workplace.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 19 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo