Let FOFA reforms bed-in: ISA

financial-planners/best-interests/industry-super-australia/FOFA/financial-planner/commonwealth-financial-planning/

5 June 2014
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has reiterated its view that Future of Financial Advise (FOFA) reforms should be given time to deliver benefits to consumers before new changes are approved. 

ISA deputy chief executive, Robbie Campo, urged the Senate Economics Committee to extend the pause in changes to FOFA for at least three years. 

Ms Campo warned that “technical amendments” to the FOFA reforms, proposed by the banks and some financial planner, would result in weaker laws than existed before the legislation, stressing the reforms needed time to bed-in. 

She said more analysis was particularly important given the Senate Inquiry into the scandal surrounding Commonwealth Financial Planning Limited’s provision of compensation to clients impacted by poor advice given by it advisers, and ASIC’s response to it. 

Campo said the banks’ proposed 'technical amendments’ to FOFA included: 

1. The return of eight different forms of commissions or sales incentives to financial planners and bank staff. 

2. Changes to the best interests test so that financial planners can meet a diluted test without having to act in their clients best interests. Allowing a planner to seek client agreement on the scope of advice will result in weaker laws that existed before FOFA. 

3. Permitting financial planners to charge ongoing percentage based fees without provide ongoing financial advice by removing the 'opt-in’. 

4. Extending generous grandfathering provisions to increase the payment of commissions from existing clients to financial planners by a further $2.8 billion to nearly $9 billion over the next 14 years. 

Rejecting the banks’ proposed changes, Campo said the interests of clients, super fund members and retirees should be put ahead of the demands of financial institutions and advisers. 

She highlighted research, carried out by RiceWarner Actuaries, on behave of the ISA, which found the proposed changes could cost consumers $7.5 billion over 14 years.  

“However, the RiceWarner analysis is conservative and does not quantify the cost of the dilution of the best interests duty, which as past collapses have shown, have a profound impact on consumers”, she said. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3