Labor votes down FOFA amendments

financial-advice/industry-super-funds/FOFA/federal-opposition/future-of-financial-advice/

20 November 2014
| By Jason |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Opposition has voted down in the Senate the amendments to the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) legislation after protracted debate and procedural wrangling which occupied most of yesterday's sitting time.

The FOFA amendment regulations, which were due to be voted on by 27 November at the latest, were voted down by 32 votes to 30 after the Labor Party secured the support of Palmer United Party Senator Jacqui Lambie and Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party Senator Ricky Muir on Tuesday night.

Their votes combined with those of Labor, the Greens and independent Senators Nick Xenophon and John Madigan were sufficient to reset the FOFA landscape back to the shape it held when the legislation was first introduced into Federal Parliament in June 2013 under the previous Gillard Government.

The disallowance vote took place at 7:37pm on Wednesday and followed a protracted morning session of the Senate and in which Labour attempted to suspend standing orders and introduce the vote to disallow the amendments.

This was blocked by the Government with Labor reintroducing the motion during question time at 2:30pm and setting off a lengthy debate which culminated in the vote.

Senator Lambie and Muir were previously involved in a deal to support the FOFA amendments and were called on by Liberal Senators throughout proceedings to explain their decision to vote against the amendments.

Lambie stated her decision to change her vote was based on consultation with "people bodies like the National Seniors, and consumer advocates like Choice".

Muir defended his decision by stating he had also spoken with consumer groups and investors who had suffered losses and believed the changes to FOFA needed to be brought to Parliament in the form of legislation, and bot via regulation, and thus subject to full debate.

"I am not interested in hearing about whether the government thinks this is all about the industry super funds and the union movement, nor am I interested in hearing about whether the opposition think this all about keeping the big banks happy," Muir said.

"What I am interested in is protecting consumers and protecting my constituents. This disallowance motion ensures that any proposed changes to financial advice laws that impact on consumers are properly scrutinised by the parliament."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 2 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo