Introduce flat tax for low income earners and unemployed.

income tax taxation baby boomers federal government

6 August 2014
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

Income tax should be levied on a flat basis across all income recipients including the unemployed, benefits recipients and low income earners according to KPMG partner Bernard Salt.

Speaking at the Associated Advisory Practices conference Salt stated the levying of tax across all people drawing an income was essential in developing a culture of contribution.

"The problem we have with our tax system is there is a sector that does not connect with how their lifestyle is funded and they don't care either," Salt said.

"The push back against the Federal Government's changes to the tax burden is that many agree there is a need to pay more tax but are saying ‘Just not me right now, I have had rough trot'. This attitude touches on sense of entitlement that exists within the nation."

Salt said there was a need to change the idea that past economic growth driven by "good terms of trade, industry booms and dumb luck" was normal and baby boomers who have paid tax should not expect to be able to access the pension system as they have done in the past.

"The wind at our back that gave us untold prospeorty will turn to the front but more boomers remain with their hands out and less workers paying tax."

"Managing the volume of expectations and the values of expectations from boomers will be critical for planners to understand that sector as they move from full time work into full or part retirement," Salt said.

He also rejected claims that high income earners were not paying sufficient levels of tax and as a result were required to pay income tax and superannuation levies.

"It is an ideological myth that the rich don't pay tax. The top two per cent of tax payers pay 25 per cent of tax but are being targetted for more tax, and the opprobrium of the nation for being rich, not by ill gotten gains but by hard work."

"No-one defends this group because its seems a bit like defending smokers rights. It seem legitimate to discriminate against some people in this country."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

5 days 20 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 11 hours ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 weeks 1 day ago