Insurance in super code must be binding
Any code of conduct covering insurance inside superannuation needs to be enforceable on superannuation funds and insurers from the get-go, according to plaintiff law firm Maurice Blackburn.
Maurice Blackburn principal, Josh Mennen warned against any watering down stating it was essential that the Insurance in Superannuation Working Group (ISWG) guaranteed that all parties, including trustees, were bound by the final code of conduct.
“The ISWG appear to be considering watering down the crucial objective that all trustees of regulated super funds be bound by the code from inception,” he said and noted reported comments that the final code might not be enforceable to begin with.
“To the extent that the concerns raised in submissions have merit, they can and should be resolved to ensure that all trustees are on board when the code comes into force in 2018,” Mennen said.
The law firm cautioned against the ISWG allowing concerns about conflicts between the code and the provisions of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act being allowed to substantially erode the value of the code.
“The ISWG process must ensure any final code from the get-go has teeth or it risks having all the bite of a month-old lettuce. It must be enforceable with regulatory oversight and binding,” Mennen said.
“For the ISWG to concede that it is comfortable with releasing a final code that might ‘start non-binding’ and that if ‘enough sign up from the outset it will become the industry standard’ undermines the basic objective of an enforceable code of conduct,” he said.
Recommended for you
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has lowered rates to a level not seen since mid-2023.
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
