Hayne failed and APRA failed on industry funds
Members of a key Parliamentary Committee have found that the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry was deficient because it failed to fully examine industry funds.
NSW Liberal backbencher and member of the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, Jason Falinski, has told the Parliament that he also believes that the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) had also fallen short of expectations.
Speaking during the debate on the Financial Regulator Assessment Authority Bill, Falinski joined with a number of other Government back-benchers in strongly criticising both the Royal Commission and the roles played by APRA and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
Falinski said during the debate that the Economics Committee had been undertaking an inquiry into the implementation of the Hayne Royal Commission's recommendations and that, “what we've found in that inquiry is that the Hayne Royal Commission was deficient”.
“It was deficient in its inquiry; let this chamber be in no doubt. It brought forward two industry funds for questioning. It never questioned IFM [Industry Funds Management], another donor to the Labor Party. It never questioned Industry Super associations,” Falinski said.
“We asked APRA, 'How is it that Industry Super can be using members' money, when members were never asked whether they wanted to give that money to Industry Super—it was taken from them by force of legislation and industrial agreement—to pay journalists at the ABC?,” he said.
“The answer from APRA was that they didn't know, because Industry Super holdings were so complex that they had no oversight.
“The Hayne Royal Commission had two industry funds come before it who admitted that they had spent tens of millions of dollars on marketing to fund managers for no clear benefit to their members, but it just let the inquiry cease, stop.
“What we on the Economics Committee have found is a cartel that is using the money of Australians to probably advance the political interests of that body. But we don't know that, because our regulators have refused to do it. I'm not saying 'have not wanted to' or 'have been incapable of'; they have refused to do it. And the Labor Party wants to shut that discussion down,” Falinksi said.
Recommended for you
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.
The Senate economics legislation committee has recommended Schedule 1 of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes legislation be passed as it is a “faithful implementation” of the recommendations.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has handed down his third budget, outlining the government’s macroeconomic forecasts and changes to superannuation.
