Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FSI not best place to debate FOFA changes

government-and-regulation/financial-services-sector/financial-advice/financial-advisers/corporations-act/FOFA/real-estate-investment/investment-advice/

14 April 2014
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Financial Systems Inquiry (FSI) is not the appropriate forum to canvass further changes to the financial planning sector, according to Minter Ellison, which claims the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms should be allowed to settle in before they are reviewed further.

In its submission to the FSI, Minter Ellison stated that financial advisers had already gone through significant change. It said further change in the short term was not appropriate until enough time had passed to examine the effectiveness of the FOFA changes.

Rather, Minter Ellison asked the FSI to consider whether different regulatory regimes were still appropriate and questioned why some sectors were covered by national law, state law or left unregulated.

"Financial product advice is regulated under the Corporations Act, while real estate investment advice is regulated under state-based regimes and other forms of investment may not be specifically regulated at all."

"Consideration should be given to whether a single investment advice licensing regime should be introduced based on the activity rather than the nature of the investment."

Minter Ellison claimed a reduction in regulation in the retail wealth industry would improve the financial services sector and make it easier for consumers to become financially literate.

The submission stated consumer protection needed to be balanced between protecting consumers from themselves and empowering them to protect themselves without having to impose further regulation or legislation.

Minter claimed regulators, policy settings, licensing regimes and complexity of the financial sector have contributed to limiting the focus of the sector on consumer education.

"At the heart of all of this is the main stakeholder — the consumer — and what we can reasonably expect of them. We believe that the industry as a whole needs to move to a position where we can expect more of consumers because they are better educated."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND