Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FPA rejects changed FOFA bills

financial-planning-association/FOFA/financial-advice/industry-super-funds/industry-funds/industry-super-network/chief-executive/association-of-financial-advisers/AFA/brad-fox/federal-government/

14 October 2011
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association has accused the Federal Government of making further amendments to the draft Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) legislation without conducting further consultation with the industry.

Reacting to the introduction of the FOFA bills to the House of Representatives on Thursday, Financial Planning Association (FPA) chief executive Mark Rantall said the changes, particularly the imposition of retrospectivity around annual fee disclosure statements, meant the FPA could not support the legislation as it currently stands.

At the same time, Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) chief executive Richard Klipin has taken issue with the explanatory memorandum underpinning the bills, including heavily disputed research undertaken by Rice Warner.

He said the inclusion of the Rice Warner research "demonstrates that while aware of the impact of the legislation, the Minister has the audacity to pretend that it is a plan for growth for the financial advice industry".

"The FOFA bill is part of a cleverly contrived plan to concentrate control of Australians' superannuation money in the hands of the union-controlled industry super funds for the benefit of the Labor Party," Klipin said.

Rantall said the FPA was disappointed with how the legislation had been drafted and by the amendments made to FOFA Tranche 1 - something that meant the organisation could not support the bill as it currently stands.

"The FPA has held many open conversations with Government outlining where our members stand in relation to opt-in and FOFA in general, and how it will affect consumers," he said.

Rantall noted the bill had been supported by consumer group Choice and the Industry Super Network, but said he believed both organisations were driven by self-interest rather than consumer interest.

AFA president, Brad Fox claimed the legislation would serve to decimate small business advisers and favour the large institutions and industry funds.

"Small business advice practices in the suburbs and in regional areas will struggle to survive, which means the only advice available to consumers will be that provided by large institutions and industry funds," he said. "It is a retrograde step."

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND