Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FPA laments confusing FOFA process

fpa-chief-executive/FPA/financial-advice/FOFA/parliamentary-joint-committee/chief-executive/future-of-financial-advice/treasury/government/

24 January 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has renewed its call for the restricted use of the term "financial planner" at the same time as lamenting the degree to which the Government's Future of Financial Advice legislation has drifted away from the bipartisan findings of the Ripoll Review.

The FPA chief executive, Mark Rantall, used an opening address to the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) reviewing the FOFA bills to describe the "dramatic shift" from the original representation and "measures not representative of the PJC recommendations at all".

"The FPA questions this transition, how it has come about, what interests are being served and whether the fundamental objectives and goals of FOFA have actually been achieved," he said.

"It is the FPA's view that the FOFA legislative framework fails to protect consumers from the worst effects of product and gatekeeper failure, will reduce competition especially amongst the independent/boutique groups, and will ultimately increase the cost of financial advice to the average Australian who needs it most," Rantall said.

Further, the FPA chief executive pointed to concerns about the consultative processes which had been employed by the Treasury and the Minister's office.

While acknowledging the FPA's close involvement, he also said that "the process of the reform agenda was never documented, and many decisions were made that caused much confusion to the FPA and the consultation group in general - especially as to how and why certain decisions were made".

"For example, the decision to amend the fee disclosure statement from originally only applying to new clients in the draft legislation to then applying to all clients in the current legislation is a clear case in point," Rantall said. "Similarly, the expansion of Opt-In from within the MySuper framework and extending to all financial advice is another example."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

5 days 19 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks 2 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND