FOFA's stockbroking commission ban ill-considered

FOFA/australian-securities-exchange/financial-advice/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/corporations-act/

11 August 2011
| By Chris Kennedy |
image
image
expand image

A ban on stockbroking commissions proposed in the Government's Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reform package will be detrimental for the industry and have unintended consequences, according to the Stockbrokers Association of Australia.

The impact of such a ban has not been fully considered in the framing of FOFA reforms, according to the association's official submission.

The stockbrokers argue the ban should not apply to direct equities because the commissions are paid directly to the broking firm by the client rather than by the product issuer on a per-transaction basis, meaning the payments are essentially a fee for service model already. Payments are also fully disclosed and product neutral, the submission noted.

The issue of churning by stockbrokers has also been grossly overstated, with clients protected from the practice by Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) market integrity rules, Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) operating rules as well as the Corporations Act, the submission stated.

The association said its proposals are in line with regulations in the UK and Europe where similar reforms don't cover direct equities.

The submission advised that any proposed ban in stamping fees would cause difficulties for Australian companies raising capital, and therefore reduce opportunities for investors and damage Australia's potential to grow as a financial centre.

Stockbroking firms providing services to the clients of licensed intermediaries should also not be caught by the FOFA ban because the advisory relationship remains between the client and intermediary and fees are charged on a fee for service basis and are transparent and product neutral, the submission stated.

The association also said it had not been properly consulted in the same way other segments of the industry had. The association complained that the release of draft legislation is now imminent and there had been no period allowed for policy discussion, with the only communication provided to stockbrokers coming from an FAQ on the FOFA website.

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS