FOFA to bolster institutions

financial advice industry money management professional investment services FOFA government chief executive

14 October 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The Government’s Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms carry with them the risk of tilting the financial advice industry in favour of the major institutional players.

That is the assessment of Count Financial chief executive Andrew Gale, who told a Money Management roundtable (to be published in Money Management on October 28) that “there is a distinct possibility that it will lead to increased concentration of the industry because, especially in the non-aligned part of the sector, organisations may well need to reconfigure their business models”.

“And the reality is that I think some of the larger organisations that have got the wherewithal and the capability and the capital to make that transition will be able to do so, while the smaller to mid-sized licensees will find that more challenging,” Gale added.

“So I think it’s inevitable that if the FOFA changes go through as they’ve announced them thus far, it will lead to increased and accelerated concentration in the industry,” he said.

Gale questioned whether this was an outcome that the Government and the public policymakers actually wanted.

“It’ll actually more than likely lead to a reduction in the level of competition in the market, and with that tilt to the vertically integrated players, it may also lead to a reduction in the independence of advice,” he said. “So there’s a range of risk factors there in terms of if you take the macro view on the FOFA reforms, which the public policymakers really need to think through now.”

Professional Investment Services managing director Grahame Evans said that while he acknowledged the extensive consultative processes that had been pursued by the Government in delivering the FOFA proposals, he did not believe some of the major institutions had done enough to support the arguments of the advice industry.

“They sat back and watched the industry actually crumble,” he said. “They had an opportunity to go in and support the industry and I don’t believe they actually did it.

“I think they were absent from that situation. So now we’ve got to go and fight a rear-guard action on the value of advice, because it wasn’t done at the time,” Evans said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

4 weeks ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

2 days 8 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS