Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FOFA amendment changes extra levers to prosecute advice disputes

FOFA/government-and-regulation/federal-government/financial-advice/investments-commission/federal-opposition/future-of-financial-advice/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

11 August 2014
| By Jason |
image
image image
expand image

The changes to the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) amendments struck between the Federal Government and Palmer United Party (PUP) will act as further levers against a planner in the event there is a dispute with a client.

Centrepoint Alliance audits and regulatory compliance manager Charlie Huang said the changes to the amendments agreed between the Federal Government and PUP to defeat a disallowance motion brought by the Federal Opposition appeared to be mainly administrative but could easily be used against planners by clients, litigators and regulators.

Huang, speaking at the Associated Advisory Practices conference last week, said the addition of statements indicating that an adviser has acted in the client's best interest and has prioritised their interests ahead of the advisers were more than just confirmation of the intent or extent of FOFA legislation.

He said that further statements, including that all fees were disclosed, a 14 day cooling off period was in place and that any changes to instructions were to be signed off by the client and adviser were binding and could be used against a planner in a dispute.

"You may feel these are just a few additional lines that have to be added to a statement of advice (SOA) but they become a few more levels the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, clients and litigators can pull when things go wrong," Huang said.

"FOFA compliance is all about the documents and statements that a planner makes to a client and you have to specifically put these statements in an SOA. However if you act contrary to these statements you can be up for misleading or deceptive conduct, for making false and misleading statements and various breaches of the Corporations Act."

"These are not areas in which you can pay lip service, you will be required to do what you say."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND