Director banned for seven years by ASIC

ASIC/banning/regulation/

5 May 2020
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

 

A former director at Olive Financial Markets, Scott John Morrison, has been banned by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) for seven years for failing to act in the best interest of clients.

Morrison, of NSW, was the firm’s sole director between 20 February, 2013 to 13 November, 2019 and ASIC found that he had failed to act in the best interest of clients, was not competent to provide financial product advice, was likely to contravene financial services law and was involved in contraventions by Olive where it engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and made false or misleading statements.

The regulator also cancelled Olive’s Australian financial services licence (AFSL) as it had not complied with licensee obligations and was likely to contravene them in the future.

Between the period covered, 2013-2018, Olive operated two Gold Coast-based businesses which were a managed discretionary account service and a superannuation rollover business.

The MDA service traded in contracts for difference (CFDs) over equities, commodities, indices and foreign exchange while the superannuation rollover business involved clients being cold-called and advised to roll over their superannuation from their existing fund to be managed by Olive on either the Hub24 or Netwealth Investments platform.

ASIC found Olive had:

  • Failed to ensure that it provided financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly;
  • Engaged in unconscionable conduct;
  • Engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and made false or misleading statements;
  • Contravened the hawking prohibitions by making unsolicited calls to potential clients;
  • Failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that its representatives complied with their obligations to act in the best interests of clients, and their obligations not to make false or misleading statements or engage in misleading or deceptive conduct;
  • Did not comply with obligations to ensure that its representatives were adequately trained and competent; and
  • Did not have a compliant dispute resolution system.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

4 weeks ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

2 weeks 5 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS