Court finds RC case study firm acted ‘unconscionably’

ASIC Select AFSL

11 July 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Court has found Select AFSL, which was the subject of a Royal Commission case study, BlueInc Services and Insurance Marketing Service engaged in unconscionable conduct when selling insurance products.

It also found Russell Howden, managing and sole director of Select and BlueInc, was involved and breached his duty of care and diligence as a director.

The firms, which sold life, funeral and accidental injury insurance, were named one of the “most egregious” by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in 2018 when it came to poor sales practices in regional and remote communities.

ASIC’s case focused on the mis-selling of insurance over the phone to 14 consumers, 10 of whom lived in remote communities. English was not the first language of many of the consumers, and some did not fully understand the products being sold to them or that they had even been sold the insurance.

ASIC commissioner, Sean Hughes, said: “In making findings of unconscionable conduct, the Court has emphasised that consumers must have the opportunity to understand and consider the features of the insurance product they’ve been offered. ASIC will pursue those who take advantage of consumers, wherever they are, and including in remote parts of Australia. This case serves as a reminder to insurers to ensure their distributors act appropriately and put the needs of consumers first”.

The Court also found that Select and BlueInc provided conflicted remuneration to sales agents, namely, a cruise to the Gold Coast, a Vespa scooter and trips to Las Vegas and Hawaii.

The Court found Select, BlueInc and/or IMS contravened the law by:

  • Coercing four of the consumers to sign up to policies by using pressure tactics such as speaking too quickly, rushing through the sales calls and ignoring repeated objections and requests for time by consumers to consider whether they wanted to buy the insurance;
  • Unduly harassing five of the consumers by repeatedly contacting them and seeking payment of premiums for a policy they did not want, or could not afford;
  • Making misrepresentations to 13 of the consumers about the insurance, including that optional extras formed part of a standard policy when they were an extra cost and that there were no or limited exclusions to the insurance; and
  • Failing to act efficiently, honestly and fairly when providing financial services in running its ‘Refer a Friend’ program. This program saw new consumers incentivised to provide contact details for family and friends without their consent. Select’s agents then implied to those people that the referring customer had endorsed Select’s insurance policies. The Court found Howden was also involved in this contravention.

A penalty hearing was yet to be listed by the Court.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

4 days 4 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 4 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 2 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 5 hours ago