Canadian insurance guru questions FOFA's intent

financial advice advisers financial advisers government and regulation insurance compliance best interests FOFA government life insurance

19 October 2011
| By Chris Kennedy |
image
image
expand image

Canadian financial planning and life insurance expert Bruce Etherington has compared Australia's current round of Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms to previous experiences in Canada and questioned whether the changes are really likely to benefit the consumer.

Etherington is on a speaking tour of Australia as a guest of Asteron, running workshops aimed at highlighting the value of building trusting relationships with clients, particularly in a risk insurance situation.

It's not necessarily that advisers are lacking in those skills or an appreciation of relationship building, but that around the world excessive compliance requirements have eaten up an increasing amount of advisers' time over the past couple of decades, Etherington said.

Financial advisers want to comply with the law but it is also incumbent upon governments to ask who they are really serving when they enact compliance legislation that causes advisers to have to spend more time with paperwork and less time seeing people. This could mean fewer Australians receiving advice, leading many to be woefully undercapitalised at retirement and a greater drain on the public purse, he said.

"If I was an adviser in Australia I would be raising the question with government: who are you really helping?" he said.

Advisers should raise that question with their customers, the marketplace and consumers groups, and if they can convince the consumer that FOFA is not in their best interests they can create a groundswell that members of parliament have to pay attention to, he said.

In Canada in the past when the government has tried to make draconian changes advisers have had lobbying success by focusing on whether those changes will help or hurt the consumer, because if you tell the government how it is hurting the adviser that is too self-serving, he said.

For example the elimination of commissions from financial assets will mean only wealthy Australians who can afford to write a cheque for fees will be able to afford professional advice in the future, he said.

"This legislation is not going to encourage people to seek more financial advice," he said. "How is this move helping the Australian consumer? How is it helping the widow or the employee or charities? It isn't.

"I'm just a visitor, I'm making no judgements, I've been asked to make observations given a similar Canadian experience," he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

4 days 15 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

4 weeks ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS