Banks defy FOFA approach for mortgage brokers

FOFA banks mortgage brokers banking sector

18 January 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

While the major banks have shown a willingness to reduce some of the "sales culture" around staff remuneration, they are proving significantly less willing where their broking staff are concerned.

That is one of the key findings in the latest issues paper issued by Stephen Sedgewick as part of the Australian Banker's Association (ABA) Retail Remuneration Review in which he has called for further submissions around remuneration issues.

The issues paper points to the fact that while the banks had been forced to address major issues in the financial planning industry, they were showing only reluctant interest in addressing the same problems in the broking arena.

In the detailed analysis contained within the issues paper, Sedgewick said that "while many banks are moving to de-emphasise sales-related remuneration in retail banking for employees, there is less evidence that banks are doing likewise in their broking channels".

"Some banks have stated that their scope to change such practices is constrained by market forces and an unwillingness to risk market share by upsetting established remuneration norms. That unwillingness may itself suggest that the relative remuneration available from banks may affect the behaviour of mortgage brokers," the issues paper said.

The issues paper said "the use of upfront and trailing commissions incentivises sales, as they are designed to do".

"Where a broker can earn a significantly higher commission to sell one product over another, they are incentivised to sell that product, which may not be the most suitable for the customer, potentially leading to poor customer outcomes," it said. "This risk is further amplified through the use of accelerators (i.e. the commission increases the larger the volume sold by the third-party channel)."

"The fact that many banks are reluctant to defy industry practice and move away from commission-based arrangements and the success of campaigns based on increased commission deals suggest that the risk of commission-related mis-selling is not insignificant in this market," Sedgewick said.

"Indeed, data was presented to the review that suggested that third-party mortgages are likely to be larger, paid off more slowly, and more likely to be interest-only loans than those provided to equivalent customers who dealt directly with bank staff."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS