ASX200 companies fail in whistle-blower support

Australian Council of Superannuation Investors Louise Davidson regulation Code of Conduct whistle-blowers

14 March 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ASCI) has hit out at ASX200 companies for failing to support and protect whistle-blowers, finding that 38 ASX200 companies did not mention whistleblowing or how to report wrongdoing in their codes of conduct.

Research by the organisation found that many did not mention anonymity, accessibility or the avoidance of retaliation, which were key features of effective whistleblowing systems.

ACSI said that this was a significant oversight, as whistleblowing was intrinsically linked to ethical conduct. It was also problematic as whistleblowing is the initial source for a significant number of detected frauds.

“Unless codes of conduct provide guidance to employers on where to go to report misconduct and other important information such as how reporters will be protected then how can companies expect their whistleblowing systems to be effective? We think this is a significant missed opportunity,” ASCI chief executive, Louise Davidson, said.

ASCI also found that ASX200 companies were failing to address key risk areas in their codes of conduct. Its research found that fewer than two-thirds of companies cover five of 13 recommended topics in their codes, omitting many well-known business risks such as fair dealing, cybercrime, anti-money laundering and human rights.

The organisation warned that this could contribute to poor corporate cultures.

“Codes of conduct … are key foundations for good corporate culture. Effective design and implementation encourages ethical performance by employees and protects against inappropriate behaviour, but the quality and implementation of these resources is critical,” it said.

Davidson said that many companies did not properly support the implementation of their codes, with most failing to include an introduction by the CEO or practical tools to assist employees in the codes’ application, and were not regularly reviewed.

She said that companies having such large gaps in their codes of conduct and whistleblowing systems “represented a material risk to their reputation, licence to operate and value.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS