ASIC uncertain whether KPMG’s Shipton tax advice covered options
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has told a Parliamentary Committee that it does not know whether executive options formed any part of the tax advice provided by KPMG and initially paid for by the regulator, prompting ASIC chairman, James Shipton to stand aside.
While an independent investigation was still underway into the circumstances around the payment of Shipton’s $118,000 tax advice bill, ASIC had told a Parliamentary Committee that it was only the advice that was paid for.
“ASIC did pay KPMG for taxation advice and assistance relating to the taxation of Mr Shipton’s personal financial circumstances upon his relocation from the US to Australia,” the regulator told the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics.
“ASIC is not aware of the precise nature of Mr Shipton’s personal financial circumstances, including whether executive options are a component of those circumstances.”
In answer to another committee question on notice, it said that ASIC did not pay any costs other than the costs of tax advice and assistance for Shipton.
“No penalty notices or costs unrelated to tax advice and assistance were paid by ASIC. The Auditor-General’s letter to the Treasurer dated 22 October, 2020 (attached to the Treasurer’s media release of the same date), refers to KPMG invoices describing ‘assistance in respect of resolution of Massachusetts State tax notices and penalties due to late filing of 2017 Massachusetts state tax return’,” ASIC said.
“The assistance described above was advice about penalties and assistance in relation to the penalties related to the filing of the relevant tax return.”
Recommended for you
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.
