ASIC questioned over governance practices

23 November 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

The Royal Commission has asked the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) why recent new senior level roles were all filled by internal candidates from a limited pool, amid questions about the regulators’ governance practices.

As Senior Counsel assisting the Commission, Rowena Orr SC, pointed out, the positions were not advertised externally and, based on Orr’s reading of the relevant documentation, taken from “a very limited category of internal candidates”.

ASIC chair, James Shipton, put this down to four factors:

  • “A desire for the transition to take place as quickly as possible”;
  • “A realisation that we had a a majority of new external commissioners coming on board who were providing that external reference point and experience”;
  • “A recognition that we needed to retain institutional knowledge and regulatory experience”: and
  • “Having experienced this through recruitment process for additional commissioners and through his experience globally, it is “extremely difficult to find outside of a regulatory agency people with demonstrably referable regulatory experience”.

When Orr suggested that the appointments were a good chance to bring about some external experience on a day-to-day operational level, Shipton reiterated his point about the lack of regulatory experience at a senior level.

Shipton conceded Orr’s point that candidates could have come across from other regulators, but said that ASIC had still decided to fill the positions for the reasons above, most particularly that of new commissioners already bringing new perspectives.

Earlier in the hearing, Orr questioned ASIC’s governance structure, asking whether “it was poor governance practice” to only have executive directors.

Shipton said that he was “very aware of hypocritical risk”, meaning that if the regulator expected a standard of others, it must also meet that standard. He believed that the optimal model for ASIC was to have fulltime commissioners with experience providing strategic oversight, direction and guidance, and challenge to the executive group, who did not have executive responsibilities, and the above hires were in line with this.

After being directly asked Orr, Shipton said that it could be appropriate for the BEAR regime to be extended to ASIC and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority to require the same standards of them as those they regulate.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 1 week ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 1 week ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 1 week ago

A Sydney-based financial adviser has been banned from providing financial services in the interest of consumer protection after failing to act on conduct concerns. ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

17 hours 57 minutes ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

3 weeks 3 days ago