ASIC moves against Westpac on BBSW
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc84a/bc84a86d2fa7b08cdfe8399a155d9e69fce99b0b" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc84a/bc84a86d2fa7b08cdfe8399a155d9e69fce99b0b" alt="image"
The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) has initiated action against Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac) over its alleged manipulated of the Bank Bill Swap Rate (BBSW).
ASIC said it had initiated action in the Federal Court in Melbourne, alleging the bank had acted unconscionably and manipulated the market to set BBSW from 6 April 2010 to 6 June 2012, on 16 occasions.
The BBSW is the primary interest rate benchmark used in Australian financial markets. It's administered by the Australian Financial Markets Association (AFMA). The AFMA changed the way the BBSW is calculated on 27 September 2013, and the allegations relate to Westpac's conduct before that date.
ASIC alleges, Westpac was trading to maximise its profit or minimise losses, by having a large number of products priced or valued off the BBSW, and then trading in the bank bill market with the intent of moving the BBSW higher or lower.
Through the court, ASIC is filing to not only penalise Westpac, but is ordering the company to implement a compliance program.
But, it's not the first time ASIC has taken legal action against a big four bank for market manipulation in setting the BBSW.
In March 2016, ASIC also filed a civil penalty against the Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) for its involved in setting the BBSW from March 2010 to May 2012.
Recommended for you
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.