ASIC may have to consider competition

productivity commission ASIC ACCC regulation turnbull government competition Kelly O'Dwyer

29 March 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

In the midst of a Productivity Commission (PC) inquiry into competition in the financial services industry, the Government has proposed requiring the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to consider the effects on competition when exercising its powers.

The Turnbull Government yesterday introduced a bill to Parliament that would amend the ASIC Act 2001 to provide that “ASIC must consider the effects that the performance of its functions and the exercise of its powers will have on competition in the financial system”.

The proposed change stems from the Financial System Inquiry of 2015, which recommended that the Government include consideration of competition in ASIC’s mandate. There is no current equivalent in the law directing the regulator’s actions.

In the explanatory memorandum accompanying the bill, the Government said that ASIC was already implicitly required to consider competition, as it is “important to improving the performance of the financial system and will impact on the efficiency and development of the economy”.

The memorandum, circulated by the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer, suggested that specific legislation requiring such considerations would be more reliable though.

“An explicit reference to take competition issues into account would oblige ASIC to consciously consider how its actions may impact on competition in the financial system and will enable ASIC to favour one option over another due to its effects on competition,” she said.

The proposed legislation would also enable the appointment of a second ASIC deputy chair and allow the regulator to employ staff outside of the Public Service Act 1999.

It also specified that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) would remain as the competition regulator across the economy, as “the measure [was] not intended to limit or expand the scope of ASIC’s regulatory responsibilities”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS