ASIC funding model needs transparency

AIST ASIC industry funding costs

15 October 2015
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has treaded with caution on the proposed industry funding model for the corporate regulator, calling for a cost recovery impact statement (CIPR) for regulated entities to assess how the funding would be used.

In a submission to the Treasury, the AIST said it was concerned about the transparency and accountability of the model in the ‘Proposed Industry Funding Model for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Consultation Paper', adding the current review process lacked a holistic approach.

The submission said no revisions to the funding model should occur until a CIPR that was in line with the Cost Recovery Guideline requirements was drafted, and implementation and public reporting of the new Regulator Performance Framework had commenced.

"This will provide transparency regarding program areas and the evaluation of performance, giving a better basis to assess resourcing needs," the submission said.

The AIST also said levy mechanisms proposed for financial advice providers did not differentiate between providers who operated via private banking operations who dealt with hundreds of thousands of dollars at a time, and those who were dealing with tens of thousands of dollars if the firms had the same number of advisers.

"For these reasons, we believe that a risk-weighting overlay such as that present in a graduated approach to levy calculation should be considered to ensure that operations pay an amount that appropriately reflects the risk to stakeholders as individuals as well as the financial system in its entirety," it said.

The submission also lamented the fact that the proposal was running simultaneously with the review by Treasury into the corporate regulator's capability, and not long after the Regulator Performance Framework.

"The undertaking of these reviews separately represents a missed opportunity, where optimal results would have been obtained from running all these at the same time," the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 1 week ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 2 weeks ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

2 weeks 2 days ago