ASIC bans director for failure to pay AFCA determinations
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has banned a Sydney director for three years with his two firms having previously received complaints regarding inappropriate financial advice.
Peter Godfrey Gribble of Sydney, NSW was banned from controlling an entity that carries on a financial services business and performing any function as an officer of an entity carrying on a financial services business for three years.
Two companies of which he was director, Qsmart Securties and Quantum Funds Management, refused or failed to give effect to determinations by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA).
In 2020, AFCA made a total of seven determinations against Qsmart and Quantum in response to complaints relating to unauthorised trading and disclosure failures, as well as inappropriate financial advice and other misrepresentations provided by credit representatives.
These determinations directed those entities to pay consumers a total amount of approximately $2.5 million.
ASIC deputy chair, Sarah Court, said: ‘Directors of AFS licensees must ensure that their firms comply with AFCA determinations. This is a fundamental obligation of AFS licensees, and crucial in ensuring that Australia’s financial dispute resolution system remains efficient and effective.’
ASIC found that Gribble, as director of Qsmart and Quantum, approached AFCA determinations as if they were open to negotiation, including in some circumstances seeking to persuade complainants to accept less than the determination amounts.
“AFCA determinations are not opportunities for negotiation. Directors of AFS licensees must make sure that their firms comply with AFCA determinations within the time specified. If directors try to avoid this obligation, we will take steps to remove them from the financial sector.”
Mr Gribble’s banning order took effect from 6 October, 2022 and did not prevent him from seeking to be authorised to provide financial advice
He had the right to seek a review of ASIC’s decision at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
Compliance professionals working in financial services are facing burnout risk as higher workloads, coupled with the ever-changing regulation, place notable strain on staff.
The Senate economics legislation committee has recommended Schedule 1 of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes legislation be passed as it is a “faithful implementation” of the recommendations.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has handed down his third budget, outlining the government’s macroeconomic forecasts and changes to superannuation.
