ASFA brings new figures to super tax debate

association of superannuation funds ASFA superannuation funds axa asia pacific chief executive

30 January 2006
| By Darin Tyson-Chan |

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has reinforced its support for the scrapping of the 15 per cent superannuation contributions tax, raised by Finance Minister Nick Minchin last week, with statistics showing all Australians would benefit if the tax were to be abolished.

In particular the figures showed middle income earners, on salaries of between $45,000 and $60,000 per annum, could improve their lump sum superannuation benefits by any amount between $29,600 and $39,400 over a 30-year time line if the contributions tax was removed.

Gains for this salary band were more modest, but still significant, over the shorter term with lump sum benefits increasing by between $3,300 and $4,400 over five years, and between $7,000 and $9,400 over 10 years.

The projections were expressed in present day dollars under the assumption that the compulsory superannuation guarantee would stay at a level of 9 per cent.

“Removing the super contributions tax makes eminent sense from both a public policy and individual point of view: individuals would see their balances grow faster, able to face retirement with more confidence; the nation would benefit from the increased pool of domestic savings and funds available for investment; and future governments would have a lighter burden of under-funded aged people,” ASFA chief executive Philippa Smith said.

Axa Asia Pacific Holdings group chief executive Les Owens also weighed-in to the debate saying the proposal to eliminate the contributions tax was a step in the right direction and his organisation would support any initiatives that would encourage greater retirement savings.

Owens likened superannuation contributions to deferred current consumption, as it is classified in the UK, and argued that a tax should not be levied on funds which people were not able to spend today.

However he believes most people should receive an income during their retirement years rather than a lump sum payment, and said if that were the case it would be reasonable for the government to tax the income as earned income in retirement.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

5 days 1 hour ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS