AFA urges Bill Shorten's direct involvement

fpa chief executive afa chief executive government financial advisers industry super network FOFA financial planning association FPA AFA association of financial advisers chief executive

22 March 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Amid continuing fall-out over a document purporting to reflect a deal on the Future of Financial Advice changes between the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Industry Super Network (ISN), the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has called on the Government to act directly rather than through intermediaries.

AFA chief executive Richard Klipin said his organisation was calling on the Government to act in the national interest and work directly with the industry to achieve the required changes rather than through the ISN.

At the same time, FPA chief executive Mark Rantall issued an email to all members of his organisation disowning the content of the document and stating "the FPA [has] never and does not support opt-in".

Commenting on the origins of the document, Klipin said that if the ISN was acting as a de facto policy maker for the Government, it was time for such activity to end.

"In the interests of consumers and the people who serve them, the Minister for Financial Services and Superannuation [Bill Shorten] must fully focus on good policy," he said.

Klipin said the ISN had spent countless millions on advertising campaigns over a decade or more doggedly maligning financial advisers and undermining the value of advice, and therefore the ISN's role in the FOFA debate needed to be put into context.

Further, he said the AFA believed the actions of the ISN had unfairly influenced the FOFA debate - something which gave rise to the need for Shorten to convene a meeting of the key stakeholders to finalise all the key issues.

"This is the only way to serve the national, rather than sectional, interests," he said.

In his email to members Rantall pointed out that the FPA had worked for many years with many stakeholders to get opt-in removed "along with [promoting] other sensible concessions like a 12-month transition period, removal of additional disclosure requirements and sensible best interest amendments to allow for scaled advice".

"We are continuing to work on those concessions and more on your behalf even as the legislation is being debated," his email said.

"We cannot guarantee the final outcome as that is in the hands of the Government and the independents, but we will continue to fight for what is in the best interest of members and the professional. That includes the removal of opt-in." 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 1 day ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 12 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

2 days 3 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

1 day 7 hours ago