AFA board queries validity of EGM paperwork

AFA EGM

23 August 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

A push by some risk advisers for an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) of the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has resulted in the organisation scrutinising the validity of the paperwork necessary to force such a process.

The AFA has issued a statement confirming it has received a number of forms calling for the EGM "purported to represent at least five per cent of the voting membership of the AFA".

The statement said the AFA was now required to verify each individual form, but preliminary checking had found that:

  • a substantial number of duplicate forms have been submitted by the same persons
  • some forms have been submitted by non-members
  • some forms are incomplete

"It will take the AFA some time to correctly verify those forms that are incomplete or appear not to be from members. It is therefore not readily apparent that the statutory limit has been reached," the organisation's statement said.

It said the notice calls for members to vote on a special resolution that seeks to change the AFA's Constitution in a manner that restricts the member elected Board from deciding policy positions in relation to life insurance for a period of three years.

The statement noted that the special resolution would require support from at least 75 per cent of the votes cast to be passed.

A number of risk advisers are pushing for the EGM aimed at forcing a constitutional change on the AFA over what they claim was a lack of consultation around the processes which led to the development of the Life Insurance Framework (LIF).

Both the president of the AFA, Deborah Kent and the chief executive, Brad Fox have urged members not to support the changes which would flow from the proposed constitutional change, claiming they would effectively hamstring the board.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS