ABA calls for bank levy impact statement

ABA/bank-levy/

16 May 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image image
expand image

The major bank levy proposed in the 2017 Federal Budget requires the Government to release analysis of its impact on the broader economy, even while its “truncated implementation timeframe” goes against a recommendation in the Financial System Inquiry (FSI).

Those were some of the arguments put forward by the Australian Bankers’ Association, which expressed significant concern that a thorough regulatory impact statement (RIS) would not be undertaken as part of the introduction of the bank levy.

In a submission lodged to the Treasury on Monday, the ABA argued the bank levy failed to meet the criteria for an exemption from the requirement to product a RIS.

ABA chief executive, Anna Bligh said: “Under the Government’s own guide to regulation, only the Prime Minister can exempt a government entity from the need to complete a RIS, and we urge Prime Minister Turnbull not to do this”.

The submission also said the tax ignored the Government’s own best practice guidelines.

“The Government has failed to meet its own criteria around transparency and accountability in decisions, evidence-based policy development, and effective administration of regulation,” Bligh said.

The ABA referenced overseas examples such as Austria and the UK, which were subject to similar taxes to suggest coordinated consultation between all affected regulators including Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Australian Office of Financial Management, and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) along with Treasury and the five banks.

The ABA has also asked Treasury for a longer consultation period, suggesting four weeks to examine and respond to the Treasury analysis, draft legislation and explanatory memorandum, arguing this was reasonable given the complexity of the levy.

The five banks would have 24 hours to comment on the draft legislation on 17 May before it would be finalised on 18 May, but the ABA believes further consultation was possible given the tax would be levied for the first time on 30 September, although it applies from 1 July.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3