Questions linger over FPA chief appointment process

fpa chief executive recruitment remuneration FPA chief executive director

11 June 2010
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

Financial Planning Association (FPA) chair Julie Berry has acknowledged the appointment of incoming FPA chief Mark Rantall was conducted by a three-person sub committee of the board and was not a decision taken by the board as a whole.

Questions were raised about the process employed by the FPA in appointing its new chief executive earlier this week following the resignation from the board of Matrix Planning Solutions director Rob Pederson. Among his complaints, which were made to the press rather than the FPA board, Pederson said he was not involved in the recruitment process for recently appointed FPA chief executive Mark Rantall.

Pederson said he was never made aware of the identities of the final three candidates for the FPA’s top job, and while the outcome is now known, Pederson “to this day” does not know the names of the other candidates.

FPA chair Julie Berry defended the board protocols and refuted Pederson’s statement that he was not involved in the recruitment of Rantall. However, Berry also confirmed that Rantall’s appointment was made by a three-member sub committee of the board, and was not a decision taken by the board as a whole.

Instead, the remaining four board members were informed of Rantall’s appointment after his job offer had been made and received, and only one day before the media was informed.

The sub committee is called the remuneration and succession planning committee and this year consists of FPA chair Julie Berry and board members Matthew Rowe and Bruce Foy. Berry and Rowe said the process had been agreed to and approved by the board at the outset, and was the same process the FPA had employed for many years.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 4 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 3 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

3 days 1 hour ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS