CFD investors join class action against IG Markets
A class action is being prepared against IG Markets on behalf of thousands of investors who lost an estimated $800 million trading contracts for difference (CFDs).
Law firm Piper Alderman and legal finance team Omni Bridgeway were working on behalf of up to 20,000 investors against IG Markets, alleging IG consistently marketed CFDs to inexperienced investors and facilitated those without proper checks and balances.
Data from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) suggested total losses by investors with IG Markets of over $800 million.
A CFD was a type of leveraged financial product which enabled investors to take a position on the movement of an underlying asset without owning the asset itself.
Strict conditions on CFDs had been imposed in Australia last year by the ASIC as it found 72% of retail clients lost money when using these products. The average loss between 2016 and 2021 was $9,000 a year when almost 70% of clients earnt less than $80,000 per annum.
This indicated a “very real concern” that the products were unsuitable for unsophisticated and vulnerable retail investors and should not have been marketed to every Australians who had little knowledge of trading.
Piper Alderman partner, Martin del Gallego, said: “CFDs are little more than a form of gambling which has left tens of thousands of Australians out of pocket. Our proposed class action will seek to recover these losses for investors who should never have been exposed to trading in such complex, high-risk products”.
The proposed class action would be registered in the Federal Court, following further investigation by Piper Alderman and Omni Bridgeway.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Trustee and fund administration platform MSC Group has promoted Shelley Brown as its chief operations officer, having successfully completed the integration of the Certane Corporate Trust business.
Australian Unity’s group managing director and chief executive has announced his plans to retire at the end of the year after two decades leading the company.
TAL has appointed a senior manager for investment strategy and portfolio management who joins from a lead role at AIA.
Global wealth management platform FNZ has appointed a new group head of APAC, while boutique investment manager TWC Invest welcomes a chief technology officer.
Were these products marketed by licensed advisers? Could this in the future be hidden under "good advice"? Will the current TMD regime clarify the inappropriateness of this product for an "average" investor? Last questions to ASIC: "where were you and are we going to be paying for this?"