Why banks are exiting wealth and insurance

4 October 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

An increasing regulatory burden has been influential in some banks exiting elements of their insurance and wealth management businesses, but most managers believe increased regulatory scrutiny is warranted if the sector is to restore its reputation.

That is the bottom line of new research released by Australian academics Dr Shantha P Yahanpath and Shah Yahanpath from the Sydney Business School at the University of Wollongong and presented to an academic forum at Harvard with the pair's earlier research having concluded that the banks have likely been disappointed by their investment in wealth management base on the returns to shareholders in the short-term.

In their latest research the two academics have pointed to the manner in which the increasing regulatory burden has been critical to decision-making by the banks, including influencing the decision by National Australia Bank to sell 80 per cent of its MLC Insurance business to Nippon Life.

They claimed that some insurance businesses had not only been the subject of increasing domestic regulation but also international banking regulation.

"This led to [the] selling of insurance divisions, such as MLC selling [the] insurance arm to Nippon Life," the two academics said.

They said that their research had revealed that senior managers in both wealth management and insurance believed that increased levels of regulation had adversely impacted profitability and that there had been disproportionate attention from regulators due to staff misconduct which had then led to "disproportionate allocation of resources including senior management time.

However the two academics said the results of a survey conducted during their research revealed solid support for a strong regulatory framework, with most executives believing that while the additional regulatory burden had a short-term adverse effect it would ultimately deliver long-term benefits.

Interestingly, the survey revealed senior executives divided in their opinion on a parliamentary inquiry into financial services with 36.17 per cent in favour, with 36.17 believing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) was sufficient.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 1 week ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 2 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

A Sydney-based financial adviser has been banned from providing financial services in the interest of consumer protection after failing to act on conduct concerns. ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

1 day 6 hours ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

3 weeks 4 days ago