When indexed IP policy pay-outs exceed actual earnings

earnings income protection ClearView greg martin income protection insurance life insurance

1 February 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Many indexed income protection policies are paying out more than people are actually earning and this, in turn, is impacting claims experience, according to a white paper developed by life/risk insurer, ClearView.

The white paper, authored by ClearView’s chief actuary and risk officer, Greg Martin has argued for a fresh approach to income protection portfolios to break what he describes as a worrying pattern of rising claims and then rising premiums.

Martin argues that demand for income protection insurance should be unshakably strong because it protects what is arguably a person’s most valuable asset – their ability to earn money throughout their working life, yet many Australians are more likely to buy insurance to protect their car or pet.

“It’s too simplistic to blame heightened media and regulatory scrutiny of the financial services industry, mounting mental health-related claims and recent price instability for the discontentment of both consumers and insurers,” he argues.

Martin said focusing on these factors alone would not properly address the issue and cited the effects of cyclical trends in underemployment (as opposed to headline unemployment) and slow wages growth as key factors behind the decline of income protection.

He said headlines heralding Australia’s almost 30 years of uninterrupted economic growth and prosperity paint a rosier picture than what the average worker was actually experiencing.

 “Income protection claims follow economic cycles, with poor economic circumstances driving increased claims. The industry’s claims experience reflects the underlying reality rather than the headlines,” Martin said.

 “On top of this, the long period of weak wages growth has resulted in many indexed insured benefit amounts exceeding policyholders’ actual income ratios, meaning the insured benefits are providing increasing income replacement ratios. Higher income replacement ratios also result in higher claims rates so there’s a double impact.”

“Income protection insurance is arguably the most important of all life insurances. No other cover directly provides protection for our most important asset; our future earnings capacity. That’s why the industry must get this right,” Martin said. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS