TAL Direct slapped with $10k fine
TAL Direct, trading as InsuranceLine, has paid a $10,200 penalty after the corporate regulator slapped an infringement notice for false and misleading advertisements promoting its income protection product.
The advertisement showed a scenario where a woman was inflicted with a bite while in Bali, which would lead to an infection and force her to take leave from work for five weeks.
It then said her and her husband's Income Protection Plus that she took out last year would provide them with income while she was recovering.
The advertisement also included various fine print statements at the bottom of the screen, including: "waiting periods, payout periods, limitations and exclusions apply".
ASIC said the fine print in the advertisement did not clarify any misleading impression created from viewing the advertisement, due to lack of clarity, detail, and prominence.
ASIC believed the advertisements could be false or misleading as they gave the impression that a person off work for five weeks due to ill-health would be eligible to:
- A benefit from the product for the entire five weeks when, in fact, there would be a waiting period of at least 14 days, and up to 28, 60 or 90 days for a person's claim, depending on the policy. The person would not be entitled to any benefit during this time; and
- Receive at least part of any benefits to which they were entitled into their bank account during the time they took off work. But the product's product disclosure statement said the claimants would be paid a month in debts, and only after it was confirmed they had been continuously off work for the duration of the waiting period.
ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell, said consumers could not access the portrayed benefits due to the way the product was designed.
"Promoted benefits of a product must be consistent with what the product will in practice provide," Kell said.
InsuranceLine stopped broadcasting the advertisement after ASIC notified it of its concerns.
The penalty payment is not an admission of a breach of the ASIC Act consumer protection provisions, ASIC said.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
Policy and advocacy specialist Benjamin Marshan has left the Council of Australian Life Insurers after less than a year, having joined in March from the Financial Planning Association of Australia.
The declining volume of risk advisers meant KPMG has found a rising lapse rate for insurance policies arranged by independent financial advisers, particularly in the TPD and death cover space.
The Life Insurance Code of Practice has transferred from the Financial Services Council to the Council of Australian Life Insurers.
The firm has announced it will no longer be writing new life insurance policies in the retail advised and corporate group insurance channels, citing a declining market and risk adviser numbers.
