Retail insurance laws to require greater diligence from sellers

retail insurance insurance Insurers AFS Australian financial services licensees fold legal tmd ASIC australian securities and investments commission

31 May 2019
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

While the bulk of the responsibility imposed by the new design and distribution obligations for retail insurance will be shouldered by insurers, those selling such insurance products to clients will still see an uptick in their obligations to consumers.

The distribution obligations would apply to any person selling or distributing a retail client product to a retail client, which would include many Australian Financial Services (AFS) licensees, most especially underwriters.

According to the Fold Legal, under the new regime product sellers would have to take reasonable steps to ensure their conduct was consistent with the target market determination (TMD) of the insurance. This would especially apply to restrictions or conditions in the determination.

The TMD requirement was targeted at ensuring that products sold were aligned with the likely objectives, needs and financial situation of the clients forming their target markets.

Insurers would also have to take more responsibility over sellers, with the Fold Legal explaining that they must take reasonable steps to ensure their products’ sale was consistent with the TMD, which could include monitoring and placing restrictions on sellers.

“Insurers dealing with product sellers who have a poor track record of ethical and compliant sales conduct will need to do more to prevent mis-selling and promote compliance,” the firm warned.

Product sellers would also have greater obligations should a client complain about a product, now being required to keep records of complaints they received and when these were reported to the issuer.

Their record-keeping would additionally need to include steps they took as sellers to ensure that the product was sold in a manner consistent with the TMD, and the dates that they reported information about significant dealings that weren’t aligned with the TMD.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) hoped that these records would give it easier access to information that would help assess the compliance of both insurers and product sellers with the new requirements.

The Fold Legal clarified that these distribution obligations wouldn’t apply to referrers or to brokers who give advice to and place insurance on behalf of the client.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS