Regulators must proceed with caution on insurance commissions

insurance financial advice reforms commissions risk insurance future of financial advice government

6 May 2010
| By Caroline Munro |

Regulators need to tread carefully if they consider extending the proposed ban on commissions to risk insurance.

Although the ban of commissions and other incentives to sell investment products proposed in the Future of Financial Advice reforms paper released last week has exempted risk insurance, Wayne Marsh of consultancy Centurion Partners said this has led to uncertainty and debate as to whether the Government will consider it in the future.

Marsh said that regulators must be made aware that the banning of insurance commissions is not as straightforward.

“Firstly, all the statistics tell us that Australians are underinsured, and secondly the history of insurance is that it is generally sold rather than bought,” he said.

“So any impediment to creating demand for insurance would need to be carefully considered.

In an environment in which we know we’re underinsured and we know that insurance has to be sold, you wouldn’t want to literally adopt the recommendations with respect to investment products directly to insurance without considering the impact on the take-up of insurance.

“It is very hard, as a seasoned practitioner, to imagine an environment where you would ask clients to pay a fee and also pay a premium. I think that would be a very difficult sale and the net result would be less insurance take-up.”

Marsh conceded that should advisers charge a flat fee, there is a potential to lower the cost of insurance.

“But I think the trade-off would be that the coverage of insurance would decrease because the sales process would be too difficult.”

Marsh did not give an opinion about ongoing commissions, because he felt the issue of commissions should be considered as a whole. However, he suggested that one way of getting rid of conflicts of interest was to level the playing field between insurers — possibly by mandating the same level of commissions across the board.

“Then they must compete on features and benefits to the client, which is an interesting perspective,” said Marsh.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 3 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 4 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 3 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 3 days ago

The difference between a Record of Advice and Statement of Advice is the crux of the FSCP’s latest determination against a relevant provider. ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS