RC points to flaws in insurance rules

Royal-Commission/Banking-Royal-Commission/life-insurance/ASIC/

11 September 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry has signalled its concern at the legislative arrangements around life insurance, particularly the fact that handling and settling of insurance claims is not a financial service.

In doing so, the Royal Commission has signalled the possibility of greater powers for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) around claims handling and its ability to punish insurers who fail to live up to their duty to act in utmost good faith.

Outlining the direction of the Royal Commission’s current round of hearings into the life insurance industry, counsel assisting, Rowena Orr QC, pointed out that although most life and general insurance policies were financial products and the selling of those policies was a financial service, it was important to note that the handling and settling of insurance claims was specifically excluded from the definition of a financial service.

Orr said this meant that the obligation for an insurance company to do all things necessary to ensure that it provided financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly, did not apply to the process leading to making a decision about a claim, including the investigation of the claim and the interpretation of policy provisions, to negotiations of settlement of 20 amounts, to estimates of loss or damage, value or repair costs, or recommendations on mitigation of loss.

“This limits ASIC’s ability to take action against insurance companies where, for example, there are unnecessary or extensive delays in handling claims,” she said.

“Insurance companies are subject to the provisions of the Corporations Act and the ASIC Act concerning misleading and deceptive conduct, and unconscionable conduct. However, insurance contracts that are governed by the Insurance Contracts Act are not currently subject to the unfair contract terms provisions of the ASIC Act.”

“And the Insurance Contracts Act limits the ability of policyholders to rely on the other consumer protection provisions in the ASIC Act. Because most insurance policies are financial products, chapter 7 of the Corporations Act also imposes extensive precontractual disclosure requirements in relation to those products.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

4 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 week 2 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND